A) Global Warming is a very serious issue. Going to work by public transportation, for example, is a sustainable action.
B) We shall know, by and by, if she has it in her to handle the challenge. [Deccan Chronicle].
C) By joining forces, we can sure change whatever has to be changed.
D) The American Constitution was written by the Founding Fathers to ensure an equitable society.
E) By the way, we need some reform in the political system as well.
A) smarter ways of living.
B) eating habits.
C) government programs.
D) many advances in technology.
E) the progress in medicine.
A) Changing the conversation about aging.
B) Changing the paradigm of Public Health System.
C) The importance of Washington D.C help small businesses.
D) The entrepreneurship of the industry stakeholders.
E) The importance of a Government, which provides aids to young citizens.
A) higher education;
B) Entrepreneurship industry;
C) the food industry;
D) the game industry;
E) technology companies.
A) the widespread dissemination of misinformation about COVID-19 and the social isolation on the internet
B) the way police officers approach citizens who disrepect social-distancing measures in the New York City Subway system
C) Mayor Bill de Blasio's role in the New York Police Department administration before during and after the lockdown period
D) alternative ways to enforce social-distancing measures in New York City without an agressive involvement of the police force
A) pessimistically
B) optimistically
C) cheerfully
D) carefully
A) New York citizens arrested over offenses related to coronavirus pandemic
B) Black/Hispanic people arrested over offenses related to coronavirus pandemic
C) citizens summoned over crim es related to coronavirus pandemic in the USA
D) Black/Hispanic enforcement officials working at the New York Police Department
A) Mayor de Blasio does not understand what New York city needs
B) the police should play a bigger role during the pandemic crisis
C) New York is facing a public health crisis, not a criminal one
D) police officers want to arrest as much people as possible
Robot priests can bless you, advise you, and even perform your funeral
By Sigal Samuel Updated Jan 13, 2020, 11:25am EST
A new priest named Mindar is holding forth at Kodaiji, a 400-year-old Buddhist temple in Kyoto, Japan. Like other clergy members, this priest can deliver sermons and move around to interface with worshippers. Mindar is a robot, designed to look like Kannon, the Buddhist deity of mercy, and cost $1 million.
As more religious communities begin to incorporate robotics — in some cases, AI-powered — questions arise about how technology could change our religious experiences. Traditionally, those experiences are valuable in part because they leave room for the spontaneous and surprising, the emotional and even the mystical. That could be lost if we mechanize them.
Another risk has to do with how an AI priest would handle ethical queries. Robots whose algorithms learn from previous data may nudge us toward decisions based on what people have done in the past, incrementally homogenizing answers and narrowing the scope of our spiritual imagination. One could argue, however, that risk also exists with human clergy, since the clergy is bounded too — there’s already a built-in nudging or limiting factor.
AI systems can be particularly problematic in that they often function as black boxes. We typically don’t know what sorts of biases are coded into them or what sorts of human nuance and context they’re failing to understand. A human priest who knows your broader context as a whole person may gather this and give you the right recommendation.
Human clergy members serve as the anchor for a community, bringing people together. They provide human contact, which is in danger of becoming a luxury good as we create robots to more cheaply do the work of people. Robots, notwithstanding, might be able to transcend some social divides, such as race and gender, to enhance community in a way that’s more liberating.
Ultimately, in religion as in other domains, robots and humans are perhaps best understood not as competitors but as collaborators. Each offers something the other lacks.
A) Robôs e clérigos humanos têm, no cômputo final, as mesmas capacidades e limitações, não devendo haver preconceito contra os robôs.
B) Robôs são piores do que humanos em promover relações sociais na comunidade, mas têm algoritmos capazes de fornecer melhores conselhos aos fiéis.
C) Embora possam promover mecanização na experiência religiosa, robôs permitem que saibamos exatamente que tipos de códigos e raciocínios utilizam, enquanto humanos dependem de nuances subjetivas.
D) Clérigos robóticos têm capacidades que podem ajudar a superar limitações de clérigos humanos e vice-versa.
Injured ape
Nisha Gaind (Bureau chief, Europe). This X-ray shows a baby Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) with a fractured arm. Conservation workers rescued the animal, named Brenda, from a village on the Indonesian island where she had reportedly been kept illegally as a pet. As editors, we see lots of photographs of conservation, but this image struck me for many reasons: the ‘humanness’ of Brenda’s shape, her innocence and the dedication of the conservation centre, which flew in a surgeon to operate on the animal.
(N. Gaind e E. Callaway. The best science images of the year: 2019 in pictures. Nature, v. 576, n. 7787, p. 354–359, 16/12/2019.)
Sobre o texto “The best science images of the year: 2019 in pictures”, considerando a imagem radiográfica que ele traz, é correto dizer:
A) A imagem pertence a uma reportagem premiada, sobre o resgate de uma orangotango ferido, salvo de uma agressão por uma criança chamada Brenda.
B) A imagem foi escolhida por Nisha Gaind como uma das melhores imagens do ano, porque ilustra um ferimento com pedaços de metal num filhote de uma espécie de orangotango muito parecida com a humana.
C) A imagem, que é de uma filhote de orangotango salva por cirurgiões indonésios, foi escolhida como a melhor do ano porque há nela aspectos de humanidade e inocência atribuíveis ao animal.
D) A foto, enviada pelo editor Nisha Gaind, foi escolhida depois de concorrer com diversas outras imagens sobre conservação da natureza que fizeram parte da seleção.
{TITLE}