A) Catadores are leaving invisibility behind.
B) There are over 20 million catadores around the world.
C) Some street artists helped catadores worldwide.
D) They are able to fight back to prejudice.
E) So, now, everybody can join.
INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder às questão, considere o texto abaixo.
Am I too old to learn a new language?
Adapted from:<https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/sep/13/am-i-too-old-to-learn-a-language>
A) “put on”.
B) “pass away”.
C) “take off”.
D) “back up”.
E) “drive away”.
A) corrupt.
B) insincere.
C) unfair.
D) unreliable.
E) decent.
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
A) é estrangeiro, assim como a vítima.
B) foi acobertado pelo mandante do crime.
C) está foragido desde o assassinato, há 12 anos.
D) foi contratado por um fazendeiro para matar.
E) está preso, pois foi denunciado pelo mandante.
INSTRUÇÃO: Para responder às questão, considere o texto abaixo.
Am I too old to learn a new language?
Adapted from:<https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/sep/13/am-i-too-old-to-learn-a-language>
A) Defend the idea that adults should enroll in foreign language learning courses.
B) Inform that learning a language in adulthood has positive impact on brain health.
C) Discuss the contributions of neuroscience to the understanding of neuroplasticity.
D) Compare learning a foreign language with learning to play a musical instrument.
E) Alert that Alzheimer´s disease and other forms of dementia have been increasing.
Com base no texto, considere verdadeiras (V) ou falsas (F) as afirmações que seguem.
( ) A maioria dos catadores é autônomo e coleta lixo das ruas para vender aos depósitos de sucatas, geralmente a preços baixos.
( ) Grafiteiros são artistas que somente pintam muros nas grandes capitais.
( ) Os catadores são invisíveis, exclusivamente, na sociedade brasileira.
Marque a alternativa que preenche corretamente os parênteses, de cima para baixo.
A) F – V – F
B) F – F – V
C) V – V – F
D) V – F – F
E) F – F – F
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
A) uma explicação.
B) uma decorrência.
C) uma generalização.
D) um motivo.
E) um exemplo.
Sobre o texto, fazem-se as seguintes afirmações.
I- Os super-heróis também existem na vida real.
II- Os catadores brasileiros não são essenciais à população.
III- A desigualdade social, o desemprego e o lixo em abundância fizeram surgir a ocupação de catadores no Brasil.
Marque a alternativa correta.
A) Apenas a afirmação I está correta.
B) Apenas a afirmação II está correta.
C) Apenas a afirmação III está correta.
D) Apenas as afirmações I e III estão corretas.
E) Todas as afirmações estão corretas.
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
A) em vez de.
B) por causa de.
C) além de.
D) a fim de.
E) por enquanto.
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Dying to defend the planet: why Latin America
is the deadliest place for environmentalists
February 11, 2017
Defending nature is a dangerous occupation, especially in Latin America. According to a recent report by Global Witness, an NGO, 185 environmental activists were murdered worldwide in 2015, an increase of 59% from the year before. More than half the killings were in Latin America. In Brazil 50 green campaigners died in 2015. Honduras is especially dangerous: 123 activists have died there since 2010, the highest number of any country relative to its population. Berta Cáceres, an indigenous leader who was a prominent campaigner against dams and plantations, was murdered there.
Why is Latin America so deadly? One reason is its abundant natural resources, which attract enterprises of all sorts, from multinationals to mafias. When prices are low, as they are now, the most rapacious do not go away; to maintain their profits they become more aggressive, says David Kaimowitz of the Ford Foundation, which gives money to good causes. New technologies open up new battlefronts. Soya beans bred to grow in tropical conditions have encouraged farmers to displace cattle ranchers, who in turn have advanced into the rainforest. Small prospectors can now extract gold from soil rather than just hunting around. That opens up new areas for exploitation, such as San Rafael de Flores in south-eastern Guatemala, where activists have been murdered.
The odds of finding the criminals are greater if the victim is foreign. Dorothy Stang, an American nun who fought to protect the Amazon rainforest, was killed in Brazil 12 years ago. Both the gunman and a rancher who had hired him eventually went to jail. But that is an exception.
(https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2017/02/11/ why-latin-america-is-the-deadliest-place-for-environmentalists. Adaptado)
A) devido ao estabelecimento de empresas multinacionais como a Ford Foundation.
B) devido à grande quantidade de recursos naturais.
C) devido ao compartilhamento de terras entre agricultores de soja e pecuaristas.
D) devido ao desmatamento causado pela agricultura da soja.
E) devido aos caçadores em conflito com pequenos garimpeiros de ouro.
{TITLE}